C.705
NOTICES OF MOTION
Four Notices of Motion have been received in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 12: 1.Governance Arrangements A Motion had been received and set out in the Summons in the name of:- Councillors I Bevan, R Caserta; J Daly; I Gartside, D Gunther, M Hankey, K Hussain, S Nuttall, B Vincent,, R Walker, J Walton, M Wiseman and Y Wright It was moved by Councillor Walker and seconded by Councillor Gunther:- This Council notes the provisions of Section 21 of the Localism Act 2012 which enable the Council to change its governance arrangements and revert to a committee system. This Council resolves to change its governance arrangements to a committee system instead of executive/cabinet arrangements with effect from Annual Council in May 2013. This Council requests officers to prepare detailed proposals for a Committee system and to bring the proposals to Full Council for approval and that Officers undertake the necessary preparation including, as appropriate, briefings, training and modifications to ways of working. (During the debate a motion was moved, seconded and carried that the vote be now put) The motion on being put with 12 voting for, 34 against and one abstention was declared lost. 2.Support for Schools A Motion had been received and set out in the Summons in the names of:- Councillors A Audin, K Audin, D Bailey, M Bailey, N Bayley, J Black, S Briggs, P Bury, G Campbell, S Carter, D M Cassidy, J Columbine, M Connolly, A J Cummings, E FitzGerald, L Fitzwalter, J Frith, S Haroon, P Heneghan, T Holt, A Isherwood, M A James, D Jones, J S Lewis, A K Matthews, N A Parnell, A Quinn, K Rothwell, R Shori, A Simpson, S Smith, J Smith, S Southworth, T Tariq and S Walmsley. It was moved by Councillor Parnell and seconded by Councillor Bury:- This Council notes that Bury Council has a proud history of helping schools that are required to improve. The Local Education Authority's tried and tested methodology of intervention in a timely manner to offer help, support and guidance to schools has often proven to be the catalyst for raising attainment and enabling schools to achieve and maintain the required standards. We deplore the Coalition Government firstly in changing the legislation that was designed to help failing schools and secondly for FORCING schools to become academies against the will of schools the governing bodies and parents. (During the debate a motion was moved, seconded and carried that the vote be now put). The motion on being put with 32 for, none against and fifteen abstentions was declared carried. 3.Financial Settlement A Motion had been received and set out in the Summons in the name of:- Councillors A Audin, K Audin, D Bailey, M Bailey, N Bayley, J Black, S Briggs, P Bury, G Campbell, S Carter, D M Cassidy, J Columbine, M Connolly, A J Cummings, E FitzGerald, L Fitzwalter, J Frith, S Haroon, P Heneghan, T Holt, A Isherwood, M A James, D Jones, J S Lewis, A K Matthews, N A Parnell, A Quinn, K Rothwell, R Shori, A Simpson, S Smith, J Smith, S Southworth, T Tariq and S Walmsley. It was moved by Councillor Connolly and seconded by Councillor Isherwood:- This Council demands that the Tory MP for Bury North, David Nuttall, leads a delegation to see the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to look again at the settlement for Bury. This delegation to include the MP for Bury South, Ivan Lewis. Yet again the Borough has suffered a greater percentage cut in funding than other comparable authorities. The Council demands a fair deal for Bury Prior to the vote on the motion, in excess of the required eight Councillors requested that voting be recorded to show how each Member cast their vote, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 17.5. The result of the vote was as follows: For the Motion: Councillors A Audin, K Audin, D Bailey, M Bailey, N Bayley, J Black, P Bury, G Campbell, S Carter, D M Cassidy, J Columbine, M Connolly, A J Cummings, E FitzGerald, L Fitzwalter, J Frith, S Haroon, P Heneghan, T Holt, A Isherwood, M A James, J S Lewis, A K Matthews, D OHanlon, N A Parnell, T Pickstone, A Quinn, K Rothwell, R Shori, A Simpson, S Smith, J Smith, S Southworth and S Walmsley. Against the Motion: Councillors I Bevan, R Caserta, J Daly,, D Gunther, I Gartside, M Hankey, K Hussain, B Vincent, R Walker, J Walton, M Wiseman and Y Wright. Abstaining from the Vote: The Worshipful the Mayor. The Mayor declared the Motion carried. 4.Bury Ranger Service A Motion had been received and set out in the Summons in the name of:- Councillors I Bevan, R Caserta, J Daly I Gartside, D Gunther, M Hankey, K Hussain, S Nuttall, B Vincent, R Walker, J Walton, M Wiseman and Y Wright It was moved by Councillor Daly and seconded by Councillor Vincent:- This Council notes that the Local Strategic Partnership (LSP), Team Bury have stated their aspiration for Bury to be the place of choice to live in Greater Manchester. a popular visitor destination, the healthiest Borough in the North West. This Council further notes the scrutiny report to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on the 28 August 2012 which gives a plan for change update under the heading Leisure Services Review, stating a draft vision of Targeting provision to make a real positive difference to the lifestyles and quality of life of people across all Burys various communities. Health improvements / Public Health Links. THIS COUNCIL THEREFORE RESOLVES TO 1)Retain Bury Ranger Service as an important part of the Councils strategy to achieve these important aspirations. 2)Retain Bury Ranger Service as a central part of the Councils continuing effort to make a difference to the lifestyles and quality of life of people across the Boroughs various communities. This will also support efforts by the Council to improve the health and well being of all the people within the Borough and help reduce health inequalities. 3)Retain Bury Ranger Service as the best way the Council can act as an enabler to encourage local communities to have ownership and commitment to their local parks and green spaces. (During the debate, a motion was moved, seconded and carried that Council Procedure Rule 9.1, Interruption of the Meeting be suspended to allow for the disposal of this Notice of Motion) It was moved by Councillor James and seconded by Councillor Black as an amendment:- The deletion of the wording This Council resolves
.. to the end of the paragraph and its replacement with:- This Council notes the substantial work and achievements of the Bury Ranger Service and regrets that the unfair cuts imposed on the Councils Budget and the threat to jobs and public services, putting vulnerable and disadvantaged people at risk. It also notes that there is currently a consultation taking place concerning all the cuts to services which may occur as a result. This Council is confident that those undertaking the consultation, including that on the Ranger Service, will do so openly, transparently and fairly, taking into account all the representations made in the light of the unprecedented cuts to the Councils Budget, which will be considered at the budget Council on 20 February 2013. Prior to the vote on the amendment, in excess of the required eight Councillors requested that voting be recorded to show how each Member cast their vote, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 17.5. The result of the vote was as follows: For the Amendment: Councillors A Audin, K Audin, D Bailey, M Bailey, N Bayley, J Black, P Bury, G Campbell, S Carter, D M Cassidy, J Columbine, M Connolly, A J Cummings, E FitzGerald, L Fitzwalter, J Frith, S Haroon, P Heneghan, T Holt, A Isherwood, M A James, J S Lewis, A K Matthews, N A Parnell, A Quinn, K Rothwell, R Shori, A Simpson, S Smith, J Smith, S Southworth and S Walmsley. Against the Amendment Councillors I Bevan, R Caserta, J Daly, J Gartside, M Hankey, K Hussain, D OHanlon, T Pickstone, B Vincent, R Walker, J Walton, M Wiseman and Y Wright Abstaining from the Vote: The Worshipful the Mayor. The Mayor declared the Amendment carried. The following Substantive Motion was put before Members:- This Council notes that the Local Strategic Partnership (LSP), Team Bury have stated their aspiration for Bury to be the place of choice to live in Greater Manchester. a popular visitor destination, the healthiest Borough in the North West. This Council further notes the scrutiny report to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on the 28th August 2012 which gives a plan for change update under the heading Leisure Services Review, stating a draft vision of Targeting provision to make a real positive difference to the lifestyles and quality of life of people across all Burys various communities. Health improvements / Public Health Links. This Council notes the substantial work and achievements of the Bury Ranger Service and regrets that the unfair cuts imposed on the Councils Budget and the threat to jobs and public services, putting vulnerable and disadvantaged people at risk. It also notes that there is currently a consultation taking place concerning all the cuts to services which may occur as a result. This Council is confident that those undertaking the consultation, including that on the Ranger Service, will do so openly, transparently and fairly, taking into account all the representations made in the light of the unprecedented cuts to the Councils Budget, which will be considered at the budget Council on 20 February 2013. Prior to the vote on the Motion, in excess of the required eight Councillors requested that voting be recorded to show how each Member cast their vote, in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 17.5 The result to the vote was a follows: For the Motion: Councillors A Audin, K Audin, D Bailey, M Bailey, N Bayley, J Black, P Bury, G Campbell, S Carter, D M Cassidy, J Columbine, M Connolly, A J Cummings, E FitzGerald, L Fitzwalter, J Frith, S Haroon, P Heneghan, T Holt, A Isherwood, M A James, J S Lewis, A K Matthews, N A Parnell, A Quinn, K Rothwell, R Shori, A Simpson, S Smith, J Smith, S Southworth and S Walmsley. Against the Motion: Councillors I Bevan, R Caserta, J Daly, J Gartside,M Hankey, K Hussain, D OHanlon, T Pickstone, B Vincent, R Walker, J Walton, M Wiseman and Y Wright Abstaining from the Vote: The Worshipful the Mayor. The Mayor declared the Substantive Motion carried. The Mayor called upon the Leader to move the Closure Motion in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 9. The Leader moved and it was: RESOLVED: That the whole of the remaining business before the Council be approved. (NOTE: There were no scrutiny review reports or specific items called in by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee Questions asked of joint Authority representatives and the Crime and Police Panel representatives report would be circulate subsequently. The following report was duly approved following the Closure Motion: Health Reforms - Changes to the Constitution)