Agenda and minutes

Prestwich Township Forum - Wednesday, 12th November, 2014 6.30 pm

Please let us know if you are planning to attend and have any access requirements or other needs which we need to take account of.

Venue: Longfield Suite, Prestwich

Contact: Leigh Webb  Democratic Services

Items
No. Item

PTF.423

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Members of Prestwich Township Forum are asked to consider if they have an interest in any matters on the agenda and, if so, to formally declare that interest.

Minutes:

There were no declarations of interest made at the meeting.

PTF.424

MINUTES pdf icon PDF 45 KB

The Minutes of the last meeting, held on 17 September 2014, are attached for approval.

Minutes:

That the Minutes of the last meeting of the Township Forum held on 17 September 2014 be approved as a correct record and signed by the Chair.

 

PTF.425

BUDGET 2015-2016

A presentation will be given at the meeting.

Minutes:

Cllr Rishi Shori, Deputy Leader of the Council and Steve Kenyon, Assistant Director of Resources & Regulation (Finance), gave a presentation detailing the key financial issues facing the Authority and subsequent efficiency savings to be made for Bury Council’s 2015/16 budget.

 

              The following key facts were presented:-

             

·      For 2015/16, £16 million will be cut from budgets.  This equates to a loss of £54 m (50%) of the budget in 5 years.

·      This means the Council will need to prioritise key services at a time when residents’ needs and expectations are changing and demand for services is increasing.

·      In order to do this the Council are exploring alternative ways of delivering services and reviewing organisational structures.

·      For 2015/16 the Council have received only 1 year’s funding settlement information from the Government, which has yet to be confirmed. 

·      The Council’s core funding from Government is likely to be cut by 13% (to be confirmed).

·      The Council will also face cuts to a number of grants received from the Government, for example Early Intervention and Education Services grants. This is in addition to pressures from levies from other bodies and uncertainty following the localisation of Business Rates.

 

The meeting was informed of the following key measures to address the cuts:-

 

·      Alternative Service Delivery Models - £3.420m

·      Third Sector - £0.200m

·      Income Generations - £2.012m

·      Better use of External Funding - £3.376m

·      Savings from the way the Council buys things - £1.320m

·      Managing Assets - £0.726m

·      T & C’s, Restructuring and vacant posts - £3.229m

·      Improved Recycling - £0.862m

·      Reduction in provision of services - £0.662m

 

Bury Residents were being informed of the financial issues facing the Authority as part of a consultation process for the 2015/16 budget and were being asked to consider changing expectations about service delivery; working more closely with individuals and communities to deliver services ie. volunteering/self management; a stronger focus on demand reduction such as self care/early intervention/personal responsibility; examining alternative ways of delivering remaining Council services and changing the way residents access services – “digital by default”.

 

In terms of the next steps, it was reported that from 6 November 2014 to 9 January 2015 the Council will be consulting residents and stakeholders on the package of cuts needed for 2015/16.  This will be followed by a review of the consultation feedback which will be fed into the budget setting process for 2015/16.  The Council will debate the 2015/16 budget and formally approve a package of cuts.  Residents were informed of the various ways they can contact the consultation team and leave comments by 9 January 2015.

 

Questions and comments were invited and the following issues were raised:

 

·         Paul Gerrard and Geoff Brown asked when the Council would stop making unsustainable cuts to services that were being forced on them as result of the Governments’ austerity programme. The Deputy Leader explained the necessity to set a legal budget and referred to the Fair Deal for Bury campaign which seeks to lobby for a fairer share of Government funding  ...  view the full minutes text for item PTF.425

PTF.426

POLICE UPDATE

Minutes:

 

Inspector Kenny attended the meeting in order to provide an update on key police issues in Prestwich. It was reported that darker winter nights brought increased pressures on the Police particularly in respect of burglary, vehicle crime, and anti-social behaviour (ASB).

 

In response to concerns about drug related ASB in the Clough area, Inspector Kenny undertook to look into the matter and report back.

 

The Chair, Councillor Heneghan, referred to a request at the last meeting and asked if future Police updates could include information relating to detection and conviction rates.

 

It was agreed:

 

              That the information provided be noted and Inspector Kenny be thanked for his contribution to the meeting.

 

PTF.427

CHILDREN'S CENTRES CONSULTATION

A presentation will be given at the meeting.

Minutes:

              Councillor Gill Campbell, Cabinet Member of Children and Young People and Ian Chambers , Assistant Director of Learning, gave a presentation on the proposed new delivery model for Children Centres in Bury.

 

              The meeting was informed of the key objectives for Bury Children Centres:-

 

1.   To improve health for under 5’s – measured by higher rates of breast feeding, reduced obesity and improved dental hygiene.

2.   To improve child development – measured by improved school readiness and an increasing proportion of children achieving a good level of development.

3.   Reducing the risk of mistreatment or abuse of under 5’s – measured by

reductions in the rate of family needs escalating to a level requiring family intervention.

4.   Improving families’ economic prospects measured by reduced numbers of under 5’s in households on benefits.

 

It was reported that these objectives will be used to drive resource allocation to specific centre activities.  The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) rankings will be used to directly allocate overall resources – funding being directly linked to deprivation.  The driver will be the number of children within a reach area for a Children Centre who are under 5 and living in a Lower Super Output Area.  These are among the 40% most deprived nationally.

 

The presentation provided detailed information of the targeted support on offer as part of the objectives in relation to health, school readiness, Early Help and job readiness.  Specific detail was also provided in relation to the proposed Children Centre Hubs across Bury.  The meeting was informed as to how each Hub would work, the staffing changes involved, outreach deployment and of the necessary steps required in order to convert the other sites in order to deliver the 2 year old offer in Bury.  It was reported that from September 2014, 40% of 2 year olds should have access to free nursery places (a total of 1177 children in Bury).  There was a current forecast of a shortage of 638 places (October 2014).  The Council propose that Children Centres which are no longer required as Hubs will be offered as centres for the 2 year old offer.

 

In relation to service costs it was reported that total expenditure on Children’s Centres in 2013/14 was £2.875m.  The Council had seen a reduction of the Government’s Early Intervention Grant of over £2.8m since 2012/13 and that the new proposed model of delivery will cost £1.949m which will deliver a proposed savings target for the service of £820k.  The consultation period had been extended to 15 December, 2014 and following an analysis of feedback received and subsequent consideration by Cabinet, implementation of the proposals would begin from 1 April, 2015.

 

Questions and comments were invited from those present at the meeting and the following issues were raised:

 

·         Sian Crosby expressed concerns that the proposals would mean a reduction in preventative work which will have the result of increasing future overall costs. Further concerns were raised in relation to Prestwich losing 2 of 3 buildings; a halving  ...  view the full minutes text for item PTF.427

PTF.428

TOWNSHIP PLAN

The Township Co-ordinator will provide an update at the meeting.

Minutes:

It was agreed:

                  

That an update on this item be deferred to the next meeting of the Prestwich Township Forum.

 

PTF.429

PUBLIC QUESTION TIME

A period of up to 30 minutes has been set aside for members of the public to ask questions or raise issues of concern relating to the provision of local services.

 

Minutes:

The Chair invited questions/comments and representations from members of the public present at the meeting.  The Township Co-ordinator undertook to obtain a reply to matters that could not be dealt with directly at the meeting:-

 

·         Anne Hutchinson requested an update on grot spots in the Rainsough area, namely, the Plough and the old Wesleyan Chapel.

 

·         Sue Dickinson raised a number of concerns in relation to a proposed cycle lane being sited along Whitaker Lane and Rectory Lane. The concerns included potential 24 hour no parking and the knock on effect to nearby properties as a result of these restrictions. It was also asked whether cyclists had been consulted about the need for a cycle lane in this area.

 

·         Anne Hutchinson enquired about whether the Highways Department would be checking on grit levels in bins throughout the Borough before the winter weather arrived.

 

·         A local resident raised concerns about the unsafe state of an exterior wall on the corner of Butterstile Lane and Bury New Road.  

 

PTF.430

FUNDING REPORT *FOR INFORMATION* pdf icon PDF 95 KB

Report attached for information.

Minutes:

                   A copy of the Community Funding report for Prestwich was submitted, setting out details of the funding allocations to date in support of the work of local voluntary and community groups.

                  

It was agreed:

 

That the report be noted.