A report from the Executive Director (Operations) is attached:-
Minutes:
The Licensing Authority received an application for a Premises Licence to be granted
under the Licensing Act 2003 in respect of Moonbeam Coffee House, 82 Bury Old Road, Whitefield, Prestwich, M45 6TQ.
The applicant for the licence is Whitefield Brunch Club Limited, 239 Bury New Road,
Whitefield, M45 8QP and the proposed Designated Premises Supervisor (DPS), in
respect of the above premises, is Mr Aaron Cummins, 41 Ringley Drive, Whitefield,
M45 7LA. The application was attached at Appendix 1 in the agenda pack.
The Applicant had complied with all the necessary procedural requirements laid down by the Act.
The Licensing Unit Manager presented the report and as part of the statutory process the Responsible Authorities and interested parties are entitled to make representations in relation to the grant of a licence. Where representations are made and not withdrawn Members are required to determine them
Representations must be relevant to the licensing objectives defined within the Act.
The objectives are:-
• the prevention of crime and disorder
• public safety
• prevention of public nuisance and
• protection of children from harm
The application is for the grant of a Premises Licence under Part 3 of the Licensing
Act 2003 which was attached at Appendix 1 in the agenda packs.
Opening Times:
Monday to Sunday – 08:00 till 00:00
Supply of Alcohol (On and off the premises):
Monday to Sunday– 09:00 till 23:30
Recorded Music (On and off the premises
Monday to Sunday– 08:00 till 23:30
Members were reminded to note the Live Music Act 2012, recorded music and live music is permitted at licensed premises between the hours of 08.00 to 23.00 with an audience of up to 500 people without it having to be permitted on the premises licence. Therefore, if members were minded to grant the premise licence the hours for recorded music will be 23.00 to 23.30.
The conditions contained in the operating schedule submitted by the applicant were contained at Appendix 2 in the agenda packs.
Six relevant representations from interested parties had been made against this
application and some of the representors were in attendance.
The representations were attached at Appendix 3 in the agenda packs.
Members were informed to ignore page 61 as this had been included twice by mistake.
After hearing the representations made and the evidence presented, Members are obliged to determine the application with a view to promoting the licensing objectives and having regard to the Authority’s Licensing Policy and National Guidance.
The Secretary of State’s Guidance to the Licensing Act 2003 is provided to licensing authorities in relation to the carrying out of their functions under the 2003 Act. It also provides information to magistrates’ courts hearing appeals against licensing decisions and has been made widely available for the benefit of those who run licensed premises, their legal advisers and the general public. It is a key medium for promoting best practice, ensuring consistent
application of licensing powers across England and Wales and for promoting fairness, equal treatment and proportionality.
Section 4 of the 2003 Act provides that, in carrying out its functions, a licensing authority must ‘have regard to’ guidance issued by the Secretary of State under section 182. The Guidance is therefore binding on all licensing authorities to that extent. However, the Guidance cannot anticipate every possible scenario or set of circumstances that may arise and, as long as
licensing authorities have properly understood this Guidance, they may depart from it if they have good reason to do so and can provide full reasons.
Departure from the Guidance could give rise to an appeal or judicial review, and the reasons given will then be a key consideration for the courts when considering the lawfulness and merits of any decision taken.
In making its decision with regard to this application hearing, the steps the
Sub-Committee can take are:
• To grant the application in the terms requested
• To grant the application subject to conditions
• To amend or modify existing or proposed conditions
• To refuse the application
All licensing determinations should be considered on the individual merits of
the application.
The Sub-Committee’s determination should be evidence-based, justified as being appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives and proportionate to what it is intended to achieve. Findings on any issues of fact should be on the balance of probability.
It is important that a licensing authority should give comprehensive reasons for its decisions in anticipation of any appeals. Failure to give adequate reasons could itself give rise to grounds for an appeal.
The Sub-Committee was asked to determine what steps, as set out above, are appropriate for the promotion of the licensing objectives.
The Licensing Unit Manager reminded Members that there was still a process for a review if the licensing objectives were not promoted.
Mr A Cummins addressed the sub committee and told Members he was unaware of the time limit process required to transfer a licence and offered his apologies for that error.
The intention was that customers could enjoy a breakfast and if they desired then an alcoholic drink such as a bloody Mary could be served with their food. The hours of operation would be between 9.00am and 3.00pm and there was bot the demand of staff time to open for all the other extra hours. The application was made in such a manner to cater for small pop-up events for around 25 people such as the working mums networking group or birthday parties for 40th or 50th celebrations.
Mr Cummins stated he had spoken with a local ward Councillor and the business wanted to be a good neighbour. He had a restaurant further up the road for 6 years and had never needed a licence review. Residents had his details for any issues and traffic would be managed to keep vehicles to a minimum. He was happy to close the outside area at 9.00pm although this would probably not be used between September to March. He regretted not speaking to residents before the application was submitted but the business case was to provide an alcoholic drink with a breakfast which was priced around £14 so the cliental was professional people and a good standard of society.
Mr Cummins stressed that there was no intention to run a nighttime business as he had 2 young children and the general manager had a young child. They would come back in the evening to cover an event if the venue had been hired.
The local nursery across the road had been approached in relation to using their car park when the nursery had closed for the day. Although most people who want a drink would arrive in a taxi.
Two bins were emptied once a week but if there was a build-up of waste, this would be increased to twice weekly. Overgrown trees would be cut back as they didn’t want the surrounding area to reflect badly on their business. Discussions would be held about storing their bins in a nearby courtyard which had shutter access.
A number of representors had gathered in a room with access to one laptop which belonged to Mr Yoffey.
Mr Taylor spoke and enquired could verbal agreements on reduced opening times be wrote down. Mr Cummins stated that a certain number of TEN (Temporary Event Notices) could also be applied for if required but these were a time consuming administration task. The Licensing Unit Manager provided an overview of the TEN process to those in virtual attendance.
Mr Taylor’s main concern was noise levels with young families in the area and what assurances had been provided by the nursery for using their car park. He asked the committee how they would feel being in the same position and having this on their own doorstep.
Mr Cummins said the previous licence holder had an agreement with the nursery and they also wanted coffee morning events with parents so it would work for both parties and be mutually beneficial. He also suggested that a Council run street parking permit scheme could also be introduced to help.
Mr Yoffey questioned how noise would be stopped for the houses nearby and another resident in attendance stated her back garden was only 8 feet away from the property.
Ward Councillor L. Ryder who was representing residents felt if the venue was not going to open late, then why not reduce the hours and apply for TEN if and when required. Noise will impact on the nearby house on Walker Avenue and an earlier closing time would be a good compromise.
Mr Cummins was willing to limit the hours on the outdoor space to close earlier and TEN mean additional work and staff costs.
Mr Yoffey said the beer garden was metres from people’s bedrooms and other residents in virtual attendance commented it was not fair that they cants enjoy their garden whilst another requested that the trees are not cut back as this adds screening to the side of her house.
Councillor L. Ryder felt there would be a noise issue and it would upset the lifestyle of residents. Whilst not in objection to a bar element, there was an issue with timings and a compromise should be sought between the needs of the business and residents.
Mr Cummins reported that his business opened in November and it already had a licence. He would do everything he could to help and support residents and the application was in line with other businesses that trade as brunch venues. Customers would exit the venue via the front door away from residential properties to limit any noise levels.
The legal advisor and Licensing Unit Manager stated that property values being decreased and car parking issues was not a consideration of the committee.
The Sub-Committee then duly retired to consider the application.
The Members of the Panel were advised by the Legal Officer as to their duties under Section 4 of the Licensing Act 2003 to at all times consider the promotion of the Licensing Objectives, these being:
a) the prevention of crime and disorder
b) public safety
c) the prevention of public nuisance
d) the protection of children from harm
The Members were also advised of their duties in carrying out those functions in relation to the relevant provisions of the national guidance and the Council’s licensing policy statement.
In addition, Members were advised to give appropriate weight to the steps that are appropriate to promote the licensing objectives together with relevant representations presented by all parties.
Delegated decision
All of the evidence was considered with care, and it was established that having understood the application and equally noting and understanding the representations, the Sub-Committee found there were no causes for concern so far as the promotion of the licensing objectives were concerned.
It was therefore agreed unanimously that the Sub- Committee grant the application for a Premises Licence in the terms requested,with an additional condition that in the interest of public nuisance, the outdoor space was closed at 20.00 hours Monday to Sunday and subject to the following conditions:-
Operating Schedule
General – All four Licensing Objectives
prevention of crime & disorder, public safety, prevention of public nuisance, and protection of children from harm.
individuals.
The prevention of crime and disorder
Public safety
obstructions at all times.
The prevention of public nuisance
The protection of children from harm
An official identity card issued by HM forces or by an EU country bearing the photograph and date of birth of the bearer. All staff will be regularly trained for underage sales prevention. A register of refused sales shall be kept.
Supporting documents: