Use the below search options at the bottom of the page to find information regarding recent decisions that have been taken by the council’s decision making bodies.
Alternatively you can visit the officer decisions page for information on officer delegated decisions that have been taken by council officers.
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 19/06/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Decision:
See attached report
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 26/03/2020
Decision:
Fund on call costs to deliver Care Link
Response Service
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Decision:
Permission to recruit additional care staff to
deploy:
1, Intermediate Care and Reablement – Council Provision
2, Independent Sector Care Providers, Care homes, Supported Living
and Care at home, who have insufficient staffing to maintain safe
service levels
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Decision:
Provision of Equipment to facilitate Rapid
Hospital Discharge over 7 days
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
1. MECS has moved to virtual appointments
unless clinically indicated a face-to-face needed
2. Reduction in open opticians delivering MECS- reduced to
6/13
3. Should we explore what’s happening in secondary care and
can we look to utilise the community opticians via MECs to support
delivery of urgent care
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
In response to the covid-19 outbreak, we need
to urgently provide the tools for our IAPT service and other VCF
sector organisations to provide remote support to Bury
communities.
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
The RBMS process most elective referrals to
main providers including assessing/booking transport. Most of what
they do in terms of patient contact relies on paper and telephone
based activity (longer term we need to think about use of
email
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
In this challenging climate, there is a
pressing need to identify suitable self-contained accommodaiton,
for vulnerable customers at risk of Covid 19, or have been
infected. This has also been recognised as a need by the
Government, GMCA and also by local demand. The need is for the
following customer groups:
• People sleeping rough on the streets that have been infected
with Covid 19 and need to be isolated
• Those that are ready to be discharged from hospital and are
placing strain on increasingly finite hospital beds
• Single homeless or childless couple who have the symptoms of
Covid 19 and cannot be accommodated shared housing.
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 09/06/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
Please accept this as a request to close BEST
day operations in their current form and move to telephone check
ins
Bury Employment Support Service provide day centre opportunities
for 79 adults with learning disabilities.
Every single service user has been risk assessed and a contingency
put in place
Current Staffing:
Out of an Employment Team of 6.5 members of staff, we only have 1
remaining in the service. This member of staff has long term health
conditions and is over 60
Out of 3 contracted Support staff – we only have 1 member of
staff remaining in the service who has a long term health
conditions and a compromised immune system.
Social Distancing
As a service we are unable to adhere to the government guidelines
around social distancing – Our service model means we can
accommodate is 6 vulnerable customers and 1 support staff working
in close proximity in a confined space. Some of our customers have
very little or no awareness of personal space and some with very
poor hygiene. i.e. not using tissues when sneezing etc.
Emergency COVID 19 Response Measures
From 8:30 last night the government introduced the following
condition on movement
You may only leave the home to
• Go to work
• Shop for groceries, medicine and other essentials
• Exercise outside
• Provide care or help a vulnerable person
• For any medical need
As all the service users normally supported by BEST now have
contingency in place for them to be safely cared for at home there
is no need for them to leave the house
Therefore this is a request to close BEST day operations in their
current form and move to telephone check ins
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 01/06/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Lead officer: Paul Lakin
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 13/05/2020
Effective from: 16/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 13/05/2020
Effective from: 13/03/2020
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 13/05/2020
Effective from: 13/03/2020
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 14/04/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Decision:
Bury Council’s Planning/Development
Management Section currently receives circa 1200 planning
applications per year.
The Council’s constitution is currently written to enable
planning decisions to be issued in a reasonable and timely manner
by a set of criteria that determines which applications are to be
considered by the Council’s Planning Control Committee and
which are delegated decisions to be made by the Director for
Business, Growth and Infrastructure.
Presently, some 93% of decisions are delegated to the Director and
the remaining applications are made by the Planning Control
Committee. This is consistent with the Government’s view on
the levels of delegated decisions.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG)
provides guidance on how the decision making process should be done
so as to ensure that most applications that are straightforward are
decided as early as possible thus to enable the economy to maintain
momentum. Those applications that are considered to be place making
and have more widespread public interest, are heard and decided in
public meetings made by the Council’s Planning Control
Committee. The Local Government Act and the Council’s
constitution require meeting of this nature to be held in person
and in public. There is no right to speak or address the Committee,
but Bury Council chooses to permit it.
The United Kingdom has been hit by the worldwide pandemic of
Coronavirus/Covid-19 which has seen over the last few weeks and in
particular days, restrictions being introduced by the Government on
social interaction, which is seen as a key way to slow how the
highly contagious infection spreads.
The issue therefore arises on how the planning process can still
continue to function at all levels and this paper seeks to pay
particular attention to the Committee decision making
process.
Current Government Restrictions Affecting Planning Decision
Making
The situation in the UK has been changing quickly in the most
recent days. The latest guidance found on
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/coronavirus-covid-19-information-for-the-public
that has direct implications upon public decision making processes
are:
• Broad Advice
o Only go outside for food, health reasons or work (but only if you
cannot work from home)
o Stay 2 metres (6ft) away from other people
o Self isolation for certain groups and following recent
illnesses
• Stopping public gatherings
o To make sure people are staying at home and apart from each
other, the Government is also stopping all public gatherings of
more than two people.
• Exceptions for very limited purposes:
o where the gathering is of a group of people who live together
– this means that a parent can, for example, take their
children to the shops if there is no option to leave them at
home
o where the gathering is essential for work purposes - but workers
should try to minimise all meetings and other gatherings in the
workplace
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Advice/Response 24 March 2020
• It is important that authorities continue to provide the
best service possible in these stretching times and prioritise
decision-making to ensure the planning system continues to
function, especially where this will support the local
economy.
• We ask you to take an innovative approach, using all options
available to you to continue your service. We recognise that
face-to-face events and meetings may have to be cancelled but we
encourage you to explore every opportunity to use technology to
ensure that discussions and consultations can go ahead. We also
encourage you to consider delegating committee decisions where
appropriate. The Government has confirmed that it will introduce
legislation to allow council committee meetings to be held
virtually for a temporary period, which we expect will allow
planning committees to continue.
• We encourage you to be pragmatic and continue, as much as
possible, to work proactively with applicants and others, where
necessary agreeing extended periods for making decisions.
From 4 April 2020
•
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/councils-given-new-powers-to-hold-public-meetings-remotely
• Local Government Secretary confirms local authorities can
hold public meetings remotely by video or telephone;
• Government removes requirement for physical attendance at
meetings;
• Public will still have access to public meetings through
remote means;
• Change ensures effective local decision making and
transparency during the national effort to fight the coronavirus
pandemic.
The Planning Inspectorate (PINS)25th March 2020
Appeals can still be made for non-determination of planning
applications and proposals, appeals against decisions issued and
conditions imposed on consents and permissions. PINS have
restricted submission to on line only and existing appeal hearings
and site visits have been cancelled and will be rescheduled.
Planning Officer’s Society
This is a professional group represented by Planners across all
sectors. The depth of expertise has been pooled to put together a
practical solution to all the angles of decision making for the
Development Management process and can be found using this link
https://www.planningofficers.org.uk/news/dm-decision-making--covid-19.
The report is attached for information and provides a good guide to
the options available under the current difficult times.
Bury Council’s Issues and Options
Issues
24th March PCC was postponed due to the rapid increase in
precautionary and mandatory measures required by the Government at
the time. The current stated period will be reviewed broadly on
13th April 2020. The next PCC meeting is scheduled for 21st April
2020. Indications are that restrictions will be maintained in some
way but as yet there is no firm outline or proposal of what this
would be. There is therefore uncertainty.
Statute has not changed to remove timeframe restrictions which
heavily controls the planning process be that on publicity or
determination dates. Planning decisions are required to be made
within statutory timescales (8/13 weeks). Risks of not doing this -
Appeal for non-determination and costs claim / LPA
“designated” if numbers fall below Government threshold
/ have to re-pay fee after 26 weeks.
PCC meetings are normally publicly attended. However, high numbers
of people that normally attend would mean that social distancing
would not be achievable for either the public or Members and
Officers. In any event, this would be classed as a gathering, which
currently is prohibited.
The agenda requires a two week time for report writing, production
and publication. The agenda must therefore be ready and publicised
no later than 13th April 2020.
Postponement – 5 items have already been delayed. Whilst
applicants and agents were accepting of this one off, the
Council’s Local Planning Authority must have provisions in
place so that postponement does not become indefinite or without
end.
Streaming – The Council Chamber has web streaming
capabilities for full Council meetings and this is used for each
meeting. The Government have issued primary legislation to permit
virtual meetings, but secondary legislation is not yet in place to
permit the intentions to come in to force under regulatory
controls. Irrespective of the streaming capabilities, the meeting
may involve some Members who are in the at risk group and may
exclude Members or staff from attending due to isolation or
shielding reasons. The Council does not have streaming/conference
capabilities to all would need to be involved.
Executive/Extraordinary Emergency Provisions – The
Council’s constitution says “In cases of emergency, a
Chief Officer after consultation with the Chair of the appropriate
Committee or Leader of the Council and with the relevant Opposition
Spokesperson and leader of the second largest opposition group,
shall be empowered to make urgent decisions when necessary on
Council Functions relevant to their service area. Such urgent
decisions shall be processed through the Chief Executive and shall
be submitted to the appropriate Committee for
information.”
This obviously relates to exceptional circumstances which are
prevalent at the moment. In very exceptional and extreme
circumstances, where decisions are required to be taken, this can
be done through agreement between the parties described.
Following this process, the decisions can still be made on planning
applications without public or Member and staff health risk. Public
responses would not be precluded by still producing the agenda and
publicising it as normal. The public can still make written
representations up to the point of determination and already
received written comments are included in the report in any event.
PCC Members would have a working week to provide written comments
on the items, which can be collated and feed in to the Executive
decision making process.
Legal Challenge - All decisions wherever they are made are subject
to potential legal challenge through Judicial Review. It could not
be reasonably argued that the current pandemic has not given rise
to the need for extraordinary actions and as such all of the above
matters would always be subject to challenge.
Applicants - still have the right of appeal if a decision has not
been issued within the statutory time or outside any agreed
timeframe. Decisions still are required to be taken within the 8,13
or 16 week period and in any event within 26 weeks unless through
extended times as agreed, otherwise fees can be requested to be
refunded.
Third Parties – Objections and support can be provided to the
LPA on applications and are duly reported. These are an important
part of the planning process and weigh in the planning balance
where they make material planning representations.
Options: Risks/Benefits
1. Need to consider whether it is appropriate/necessary to use
emergency powers if the Council can lawfully hold meetings
virtually. However, IT is clearly not in place at the moment and
the PCC meeting is too close to facilitate delivery of this for the
April meeting.
2. Wait until PCC meetings can be safely held again and try to
agree extensions of time. This is better for public
engagement/openness but not recommended because Government advice
is to prioritise decision-making. It could potentially be 6 months
or so delay, which is an unacceptable delay for applicants.
3. Coronavirus legislation is now in force with the necessary
secondary legislation and hold virtual PCC meetings – The
legislation is permits remote meeting and this would maintain
transparency / openness. However, the Council is not ready IT-wise
but is working upon innovation to deliver this. For clarity, this
would not be live-streaming but a video/telephone conference.
4. Use urgency powers – Lacks openness/transparency and to a
degree is undemocratic. However, The Council could look at going
further than only consulting the Chair - could ask all PCC members
for views and contact objectors for a written version of what they
would have said in their address to PCC. This option could be used
in the interim and cover the April meeting and subsequent for an
interim six month period and be reviewed in the meantime whereby,
discussions between the Chief Executive, Chair, IT, Planning and
Democratic Services seek to deliver the virtual solution as soon as
possible in time for when secondary legislation is in place.
Consultation
The Chair of the Planning Control Committee was consulted whom
discussed the matter with the Leader of the Council. The response
was as follows:
"Having read the report “Planning Control Committee -
Application Decision Making Due to Coronavirus / Covid-19
Restrictions” and the accompanying guidance for planners and
information from the government, I agree with recommendation 4 of
the report.
Emergency powers, with the suggested adjustments, should be used
under the proviso that a virtual solution is sought as soon as is
reasonable, so that members of the planning control committee can
scrutinise applications and members of the public can see that the
legally defined processes have been followed.
This decision is made from a purely legal perspective following
changes to government legislation to try to facilitate
“business as usual” during this global pandemic.
I do however wish to place on record my disagreement with the
national guidance that planning should try to continue and would
urge national government to temporarily remove the time limits
placed on decisions for planning departments meaning that these
major decisions can be deferred till such a time as the emergency
has abated. Although planning and economic development are very
important issues, at this time of global crisis I believe that
planning decisions should not be placed in the same category of
emergency response as health care.
This however is a personal perspective and does not affect my
decision as chair of planning to concur with recommendation 4 of
the report."
Recommendation
Option 4 be carried out as the current circumstances lead to the
most appropriate means of ensuring that the planning process
continues, with as much inclusivity as can be currently delivered.
The option includes the use of moving to virtual meetings when IT
permits. The use of this power is suggested for a limited period
only and reversion to a more open process for Committee decision
making when the Council are able to. This process closely follows
that of the Planning Officer’s Society recommendations (page
6) and a move to Virtual meetings (page 7 onwards).
Lead officer: Paul Lakin
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 14/04/2020
Effective from: 19/03/2020
Decision:
Private Sector Housing: Private rented sector,
owner occupier, empty properties, Houses in Multiple
Occupation.
Home visits will not be undertaken unless the case has been deemed
an emergency and that a visit is necessary (risk of death/ no hot
water / no heating / defective sanitary provision/fire safety). Any
new cases of housing disrepair that come in will be prioritised and
our working procedures will be flexible over this period. These
cases will be monitored on a daily basis and depending on demand
for service if some can be resolved via a phone call, then officers
will make any necessary calls or emails/all communication from
home.
Any planned (non-emergency) housing inspections over the next
couple of weeks are to be cancelled and will be re arranged when
the peak of the outbreak has passed and we begin to be more
operational.
If it is necessary for a home visit in the case of an emergency,
the officer will enquire with the occupier regarding their age and
any underlying health conditions and whether they are symptomatic,
have been in contact with anyone with symptoms or in contact with
anyone who has returned from a county with symptoms in the past 14
days. The occupier will also be asked to take photographs and/or
videos to that assessments can be made. That information will be
relayed to the manager and head of service and a risk assessment
carried out to ensure the safety of the occupier, staff members and
contractors of entering and carrying out any necessary emergency
remedial action.
Complaints relating to empty properties and nuisance: officers will
ask that photographs be provided by the complainant and officers
will make effort to contact owner via any details held on council
tax but no further action will be taken if we have no details on
council data base systems. These cases can be dealt with at a later
stage.
The reasons for these changes listed above is to avoid all un
necessary contact with members of the public for the health and
safety of our (often vulnerable) service users, staff members and
their families at home. The service will be operating at a reduced
reactive capacity in light of the current climate but the team will
be flexible and adapt as this process continues.
Adaptations Team: Staff provide feasibility inspections for
Disabled Adaptations, this service is cross tenure private sector
and Six Town Housing.
New works to properties to be postponed with immediate effect
unless the work is of an urgent nature / to enable a hospital
discharge and only if the client/ contractor agree to go ahead.
Applicants to be advised of this delay by Occupational
Therapists.
The reasons behind this are precautionary and in an attempt to
prevent unintentional spread of the virus to those that are least
able to fight it given the customers in this group have a medical
condition and/or disabled and/or children and elderly. Additionally
our only full-time Technical Officer is self-isolating due to
coronavirus symptoms and has an immediate family member with
chronic asthma. We are left with one Technical Officer who works 2
days a week.
If a home visit is required then the following questions are to be
asked:
1. Have you recently returned from an affected country?
2. Have you been in contact with anyone that has recently returned
from an affected country?
3. Do you have symptoms? High temperature, cough, difficulty
breathing?
4. Is the client ok with us coming into their home?
We have a spreadsheet of all active cases for technical officers to
update and for Unit Manager to review – this will help reduce
our current backlog.
Major Adaptation Panel (MAP) meeting has been postponed, therefore
Unit Manager is looking at the options for virtual meetings going
forward for existing cases to progress. In the meantime a
spreadsheet is being collated of all previously deferred cases and
the new cases to be discussed. This will be circulated for comments
from all Officers who attend MAP so that decisions can be made on
each case whether to approve or not in the interim.
Other approaches
Urban Renewal have responded to the Coronavirus by gathering
information from various bodies’ voluntary/public and private
to make sure we can signpost those in need for services/advice that
we can’t offer, such as rent arrears, mortgage arrears for
Landlords, food banks and homelessness to name a few . This is an
evolving situation and we will continue to support all customers as
far as possible.
Lead officer: Paul Lakin
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 14/04/2020
Effective from: 20/03/2020
Decision:
The following alterations have been made to
the service delivery of the Building Control function.
Site Visits – Requests for site visits are being recorded as
this is the minimum legal requirement as set by legislation. Visit
requests are then assessed by the individual officers, where a site
visit is not essential then the contractor can provide photographic
evidence of the element of work in question.
Where site visits are required then an assessment is made by the
officer in accordance with the attached site visit risk assessment
form.
Submission of applications – We have contacted our regular
agents and advised them that the ability to submit a paper
application is likely to be removed at short notice and that they
should look to submit electronic documents.
Office Work – Where staff have the ability to work from home
then there primary place of employment is now at home, phones have
been diverted and new practice and procedure documents have been
given to all staff. Nominal costs incurred for head-sets /
head-phones so that incoming calls remain private.
Payment Of Fees – All payment of fees to be made online,
previously accepted cheques, phone payments and payments at the
town hall.
Complaints about unauthorised Work – We will accept
photographic evidence, and inform owners of their legal
obligations, formal enforcement powers last for up to 2 years so
these issues will be dealt with at a later date.
Acceptance of Building / Initial Notice – These applications
are being automatically accepted to reduce the processing workload.
An electronic note will be added to the case file by the building
control manager / team leader to act as the formal acceptance
signature.
Legal Notices / Documents – While we have access to the
office we will try and issue paper documents, once paper documents
are no longer available we will issue electronic documents.
Lead officer: Paul Lakin
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 14/04/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Decision:
No waiting at any time, see attached sheet for
full details.
Lead officer: David Giblin
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 14/04/2020
Effective from: 17/03/2020
Decision:
Temporary closure, Broad Oak Lane, Bury,
Utility works. Full details on attached sheet.
Lead officer: David Giblin
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 31/03/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 31/03/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Health and Adult Care
Decision published: 31/03/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 27/03/2020
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 25/03/2020
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 26/03/2020
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 20/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 18/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 18/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 19/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 20/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 20/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 23/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 24/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 23/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 23/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 23/03/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Chief Executive
Decision published: 27/03/2020
Effective from: 18/03/2020
Lead officer: Lynne Ridsdale
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Health and Adult Care
Decision published: 23/03/2020
Effective from: 16/08/2020
Lead officer: Julie Gonda
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 23/03/2020
Effective from: 27/01/2020
Lead officer: Donna Ball
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 23/03/2020
Effective from: 22/01/2020
Lead officer: David Brown
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 23/03/2020
Effective from: 29/11/2019
Lead officer: Neil Long
Decision Maker: Executive Director of Operations
Decision published: 20/03/2020
Effective from: 12/12/2019
Lead officer: Neil Long