62 Places for Everyone: A Joint Development Plan Document for 9 Greater Manchester Local Authorities (Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Tameside, Trafford and Wigan) - Proposed Modifications Consultation PDF 597 KB
Report of the Leader and
Cabinet Member for Strategic Growth is attached.
Minutes:
Councillor Eamonn
O’Brien, Leader and Cabinet Member for Strategic Growth,
presented the report which updated Members on the progress of
Places for Everyone Plan: A Joint Development Plan Document for
nine Greater Manchester Local Authorities (PfE) and sought approval
to consult on proposed modifications to the Plan. It was noted that
the alternative option was to not approve the proposed
modifications for consultation, and that the final decision on the
Plan would come to Full Council in due course.
Councillor Dene Vernon, Chair
of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee, confirmed that Scrutiny had
met to review the report and had an informative and wide ranging
discussion. This had included opportunity for public to ask
questions and express their viewpoints. Assurances were given that
Greater Manchester Ecology Unit had provided expert witnesses and
that consultation feedback would go back to the Planning
Inspectorate for consideration. The Scrutiny Committee noted the
Council agreement for Cross Party Group to look at a Local Plan and
agreed for this to be expedited.
Members discussed the report,
including the following points:
- Members noted the
advantage it would give in securing highly skilled jobs and
apprenticeships and transport links to those sites, and the serious
need for new and affordable housing stock to enable more people to
own their own home.
- It was noted that
recreation sites like playing pitches were protected, so if any
were identified for development sites they would be replaced on a
like-for-like basis.
- The cost of the
process was born collaboratively by the 9 Local Authorities, and
this work and those costs would still be required if Bury were
developing its own Local Plan.
- It was understood
that Stockport had received applications for developments on Green
Field land, one of which had gone to appeal. The Leader noted the
need to be proportionate about risk, but confirmed that not having
a Plan put sites at risk, including those in Green Belt, and
adopting this Plan would enable the Council to redirect developers
to more appropriate sites.
- It was noted that,
while Government targets were not mandatory, written guidance
stated they were a ‘minimum’ and previous submissions
had been rejected for not being ambitious enough. The report on the
agenda today was regarding modifications to the Plan, but in theory
a Full Council decision could be taken at any time to pull out of
PfE. That, however, would put Bury in a worse position in
protecting sites as PfE had enabled Bury to shift a significant
proportion of the housing allocation to other boroughs.
- Councillor Morris
expressed her disappointment that Walshaw was not removed from the
Plan but advised that she still supported the Plan overall and
would continue to lobby for Walshaw to be removed. It was noted
that the additional housing site identified was still included in
Bury’s allocation but that the overall allocation was still
lower than it would be outside of PfE.